Linked Life Data

8680704

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8680704

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-8-19
pubmed:abstractText
Mechanical ventilation using a modified endotracheal tube, allowing bypass and washout of the endotracheal dead space (McETV), was compared with conventional controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) in healthy and in surfactant-depleted rabbits. In healthy animals, shifting from CMV to McETV led to an increase in PaO2 (89 +/- 16 versus 104 +/- 13 mm Hg; p < 0.05) and a decrease in PaCO2 (41.5 +/- 3 versus 30 +/- 3 mm Hg; p < 0.05). As a result of reducing the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) from 21 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 2 cm H2O (p < 0.05), it was possible in McETV mode to maintain comparable ventilation to that achieved by CMV. In surfactant-depleted animals, compared with CMV, McETV produced a rise in PaO2 without change in thoracic volume (from 100 +/- 40 to 150 +/- 60 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and a fall in PaCO2 (from 46 +/- 5 to 37 +/- 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05). After 4 h of ventilation, the surfactant-depleted animals from the CMV group developed thoracic overdistension quicker (at hour 1, p < 0.05) and, consequently, more animals died from pneumothorax compared with the McETV group (five versus two). We concluded that McETV ensured adequate gas exchanges with lower insufflation pressures and could diminish positive pressure ventilation-induced injury.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
1073-449X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
154
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
82-90
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Benefits of the low pressure multichannel endotracheal ventilation.
pubmed:affiliation
Service de Réanimation Pédiatrique, Hopital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't