|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-8-15
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To examine the reliability of relative work value assessment in general practice consultations and to determine whether different methods of assessing work produce consistent rankings.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0025-729X
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:day |
1
|
|
pubmed:volume |
165
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
18-21
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
1996
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The reliability and validity of work measurement in Australian general practice consultations.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Fairfield Hospital, VIC.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
