Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-7-19
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of in-patient multidisciplinary treatment with standard out-patient care in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Eighty patients with active RA were randomized to receive 11 days of in-patient multidisciplinary treatment followed by standard out-patient care (n = 39), or to standard out-patient care only (n = 41). Patients were assessed at baseline, and after 2, 4, 12 and 52 weeks. In the in-patients, the improvement in variables of disease activity (weeks 2 and 4) and emotional status (weeks 4 and 12) was greater when compared with the out-patients (P < 0.05). The improvement in laboratory and functional measures did not differ between the groups. In the in-patient group, the percentage of patients responding to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for improvement was significantly greater at any time point during follow-up than in the out-patient group. A short period of in-patient multidisciplinary treatment for active RA has a direct beneficial effect on disease activity and emotional status with the favourable effect on disease activity remaining after 52 weeks.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0263-7103
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
35
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
475-82
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
A randomized clinical trial of in-patient multidisciplinary treatment versus routine out-patient care in active rheumatoid arthritis.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't