|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0031809,
umls-concept:C0175720,
umls-concept:C0234621,
umls-concept:C0242485,
umls-concept:C0243032,
umls-concept:C0340569,
umls-concept:C0449851,
umls-concept:C0870432,
umls-concept:C1261287,
umls-concept:C1555465,
umls-concept:C1705417,
umls-concept:C1883674,
umls-concept:C1998467,
umls-concept:C2348589,
umls-concept:C2827666
|
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-5-29
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The degree of stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery helps predict the risk of an individual suffering subsequent cerebrovascular ischemic events. Different techniques have evolved to measure stenosis from angiograms, leading to some confusion and a call for the adoption of a single technique. To help choose the most reliable technique, this study assessed observer variability in reporting carotid stenosis for four different techniques, from both digital subtraction (DSA) and MR angiograms (MRA). Three of the techniques used caliper measurements; the fourth was the visual impression of stenosis.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0039-2499
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
27
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
467-73
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Angiography, Digital Subtraction,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Brain Ischemia,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Carotid Artery, Internal,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Carotid Stenosis,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Forecasting,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Magnetic Resonance Angiography,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Observer Variation,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Risk Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:8610315-Weights and Measures
|
|
pubmed:year |
1996
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Walton Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|
