Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-2-23
pubmed:abstractText
Opinions about the quality of their primary microbiology laboratory were received from more than 500 practicing infectious diseases specialists by a nationally distributed questionnaire. Approximately 92% of the respondents' primary laboratories were hospital-based. These sophisticated users rated the quality of their microbiology laboratories to be generally high, with bacteriology receiving highest scores and parasitology the lowest scores. Fortunately, the serious problems, such as failing to call a critical result and culture mishandled in the laboratory, were experienced rarely. Laboratories directed by pathologists with specialty microbiology training, PHD microbiologists, and infectious diseases specialists were judged to be of highest quality. American Board of Medical Microbiology certification of the laboratory director was related to higher overall quality perceptions. Whereas physician-customer opinions may not directly measure a laboratory's analytic quality, they are an important performance measure on which laboratories can base quality improvement activities in both service and analytical aspects of performance.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0002-9173
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
105
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
58-64
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Quality perceptions of microbiology services. A survey of infectious diseases specialists.
pubmed:affiliation
Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, CA 92182-4162, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't