Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-4-1
pubmed:abstractText
The interobserver variation among three experienced endoscopists in the endoscopic diagnosis and grading of reflux esophagitis was investigated in 150 dyspeptic patients. The interobserver variation was analyzed with kappa statistics to correct for the extent of agreement expected by chance alone. The observers diagnosed esophagitis in 22.7%, 32.7%, and 35.3% of the patients, respectively (p < 0.0002). Kappa values for grade-1 esophagitis varied from 0.34 to 0.47, a level generally considered to signify poor agreement, and despite partial agreement on the diagnosis in the individual patient there was almost complete disagreement on the features used to characterize grade 1. Kappa values for diagnosing erosive esophagitis (grades 2-4) were 0.68-0.79. Considering all three observers and all grades of esophagitis (grades 0-4) the overall chance-corrected agreement was 0.55. In patients with low-grade esophagitis without reflux-like dyspepsia and when the observers expressed uncertainty in the diagnosis, the agreement rates were particularly poor. Due to a large chance-corrected interobserver variation, the endoscopic diagnosis grade 1 esophagitis is not reliable and thus may be problematic as a selection criterion for clinical trials. Interobserver variation on the presence of erosive/ulcerative esophagitis is acceptable and comparable to the level for peptic ulcer.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0036-5521
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
28
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
119-25
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis.
pubmed:affiliation
Dept. of Medical Gastroenterology S, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't