Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-8-10
pubmed:abstractText
Two chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC given on an outpatient basis were evaluated in a prospective phase II trial: mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIP) vs vindesine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP). This study included 100 patients. Prognostic factors were well balanced between the arms. Objective response rates (CR: MIP 0%, VIP 4%; PR: MIP 24%, VIP 18%) and survival (median time: 7 months in both arms) were in the standard range usually reported. Subjective and symptomatic improvement have been assessed. Toxicity was moderate, manageable, and mostly reversible. We believe that investigation for new ambulatory schemes must continue.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0277-3732
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
16
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
310-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Randomized phase II trial comparing two chemotherapy combinations for non-small cell lung cancer. Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin versus vindesine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin.
pubmed:affiliation
Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase II