Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-10-14
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk and the results of surgical treatment for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), to compare them through time, and to determine the current optimal surgical treatment. In a retrospective study, the charts of all the patients admitted for PPU between January 1976 and October 1991 were reviewed. The features believed to be of importance in the outcome were assessed for statistical analysis. A comparison was made between three periods of the study (1976-1980, 1981-1985, 1986-1991). 247 patients were included. Mortality was 11.7% (29/247). Factors associated with an increased mortality were: shock on admission (p = 0.01), age (p < 0.001), severe associated medical illnesses (p < 0.001) and the form of treatment (p < 0.01). After multivariate analysis, only shock on admission and associated disease remained significant. Chronic peptic ulcer disease occurred in 76% of the patients. Comparing the periods showed that age, associated illnesses, percentage of acute or subacute ulcers, mortality, as well as the number of patients, are increasing. The main determinant of surgical treatment for PPU is the patient and his/her general state. Because of the high frequency of chronic peptic ulcer disease, we believe that the gold standard in the treatment for PPU remains definitive surgery. However, in the presence of more than one risk factor, suture and patch are probably safer.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0001-5458
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
93
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
83-7
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Acute Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Age Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Chronic Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Gastrectomy,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Gastroplasty,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Multivariate Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Peptic Ulcer Perforation,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Prognosis,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Risk Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Shock, Hemorrhagic,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Suture Techniques,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Time Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Treatment Outcome,
pubmed-meshheading:8372589-Vagotomy
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Is there a need for a change?
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|