Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-9-16
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Selecting the most appropriate surgical approach for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and gastrointestinal malignancy remains controversial. In an attempt to develop guidelines for the management of patients with these two simultaneous lesions, a retrospective review of patients who had concomitant AAA and gastrointestinal malignancy was undertaken. During the period from January 1985 to February 1993, 229 patients with AAA were admitted to our hospital. Among these, 19 patients (8%) had a gastrointestinal malignancy together with AAA and were divided into 2 groups. Group I was composed of 11 patients who underwent either a 1- or a 2-stage operation for both lesions. Group II was composed of eight patients who either underwent an operation for one lesion (six patients) or did not have any operation (two patients). Among group I, six patients underwent the two-stage operation. In four of the six patients, the malignancy was resected first. In the remaining two patients, the aneurysmectomy was performed first, because, in one patient, the aneurysm was more than 6 cm in diameter, and, in the other patient, the aneurysm was a saccular type. Among group I, five patients (two patients with gastric cancer, and one patient each with esophageal cancer, rectal cancer, and malignant lymphoma of the stomach) underwent a one-stage operation. In three of the five patients (two patients with gastric cancer and one patient with esophageal cancer), simultaneous resection was carried out by using segregated approaches, namely, the retroperitoneal approach for AAA and the transperitoneal approach for malignancy. Although the clinical characteristics of the patients were different, 8 of the 11 patients (73%) in group I are still alive, whereas only 1 of the 8 patients (13%) in group II is still alive. The principles of our surgical approaches for concomitant AAA and gastrointestinal malignancy are as follows: (1) The lesion that absolutely indicated urgent surgery was resected first. (2) If both lesions were asymptomatic, the malignancy was resected first. (3) Simultaneous resection using different approaches was useful in some patients with concomitant upper early gastrointestinal malignancy. (4) Both lesions need to be resected eventually for better long-term survival.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Aug
|
| pubmed:issn |
0002-9610
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
166
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
108-11
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Colonic Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Gastrointestinal Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Lymphoma,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Rectal Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Stomach Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Surgical Procedures, Operative,
pubmed-meshheading:8352399-Survival Rate
|
| pubmed:year |
1993
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Management of concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm and gastrointestinal malignancy.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|