Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
7
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-8-16
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
I summarize the evolution of target-value assignment methods and laboratory performance assessment (evaluation) within the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Survey Programs and review the importance of, and longstanding interest in, medical relevance criteria in setting analytical goals.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jul
|
| pubmed:issn |
0009-9147
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
39
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1456-7; discussion 1458-60
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1993
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The history of evaluation criteria for CAP surveys.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Laboratory of Pathology of Seattle, WA 98104.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Historical Article
|