Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
792
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-3-1
pubmed:abstractText
A Monte Carlo computer program has been developed for the study of anti-scatter grids used in diagnostic radiology. The program estimates the scatter from soft tissue phantoms representative of either adult or paediatric examinations and uses dose increase, signal-to-noise ratio improvement and contrast improvement factors to study grid performance. It has been used to quantify the advantage of replacing grids with aluminium covers and interspaces by grids using materials of low atomic number for these components. Two approaches are used. First, the aluminium and low atomic number alternatives are compared for five grid ratios at fixed strip density and width and for tube potentials of 50, 70, 100 and 150 kV. Second, 44 commercially available grids are compared for three different imaging situations (lumbar spine, chest and paediatric). The results demonstrate that grids made with carbon fibre cover and cotton fibre interspace result in greater improvements in contrast and signal-to-noise ratio, and lower dose increase factors, than do grids made with aluminium. The dose reduction varies with irradiation conditions and is generally larger at lower tube potentials, higher grid ratios and lower strip densities. A typical reduction in mean absorbed dose in the patient is 30% in an adult lumbar spine (AP view) at 70 kV with a grid with 36 strips per centimetre and ratio 12.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0007-1285
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
66
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1151-63
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Selection of anti-scatter grids for different imaging tasks: the advantage of low atomic number cover and interspace materials.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Radiation Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't