Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-2-2
pubmed:abstractText
Between January 1978 and June 1992, 798 patients underwent isolated AVR for hemodynamically significant calcific aortic stenosis. Preoperative coronary angiography was performed in 687 patients, of whom 229 had coronary stenosis > 40% and were divided into three (I, IIa and IIb) groups. Group I consisted of 144 patients undergoing AVR plus coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG); 39 patients in Group IIa had AVR only in the presence of coronary stenoses < 60%, and 46 patients in Group IIb had AVR only in the presence of coronary stenoses > 60%. Group III consisted of 144 matched patients selected from the remaining 458 patients with no coronary disease, or stenoses less than 40%, according to five matching criteria (age, sex, functional status, ejection fraction and year of surgery) with patients in Group I. Early mortality was 10.4% in Group I, 7.7% in Group IIa, 13% in Group IIb and 4.9% in Group III. Although the differences in operative mortality are apparent, they did not reach statistical significance. A difference in long term survival could only be detected between Groups I and III (actuarial survival at nine years 66% and 78.9%, respectively, p < 0.01). Similarly, late coronary events were more frequent in Group I than in Group III (13.9% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.03). It is concluded that revascularization should be as complete as possible for severe coronary stenoses coexisting with significant calcific aortic stenosis. However, bypassing of moderate coronary lesions (stenoses in the order of 50%) in association with AVR does not appear justified on current evidence. Further studies on this important aspect are clearly required.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0966-8519
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
2
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
430-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Aged, 80 and over, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Aortic Valve Stenosis, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Bioprosthesis, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Cause of Death, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Coronary Angiography, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Coronary Artery Bypass, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Coronary Disease, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Female, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Follow-Up Studies, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Heart Valve Prosthesis, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Male, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Postoperative Complications, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Prognosis, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Prosthesis Design, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Prosthesis Failure, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Reoperation, pubmed-meshheading:8269146-Survival Rate
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Prognosis of valve replacement for aortic stenosis with or without coexisting coronary heart disease: a comparative study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Tenon, Paris, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study