Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-12-28
pubmed:abstractText
The white blood cell differential counts obtained by manual analysis and those obtained by automated analysis using Coulter STKS and Coulter S+IV cell counters (Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, FL) in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected population were compared. Linear correlation analyses showed the STKS to be less accurate than the S+IV in determinations of the lymphocyte and granulocyte count. This finding was confirmed by difference analyses and by determining the number of measurements that fell outside of 95% confidence limits. Similar analyses were also done on patients not known to be HIV infected, and there was no disparity found between the STKS and S+IV in that group. In the HIV-infected population, the discrepancy between the manual and automated granulocyte counts performed on the STKS, but not on the S+IV, increased with increasing red blood cell mean corpuscular volume. Physicians caring for, and investigators performing studies on, HIV-infected patients should be aware of the potential for falsely low granulocyte numbers when using the differential from the STKS.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0002-9173
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
100
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
611-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of the Coulter STKS, Coulter S+IV, and manual analysis of white blood cell differential counts in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected population.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook 11794.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't