Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
10
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-11-2
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Nine pathologists from different institutions reviewed in a double-blind study 16 breast tumors previously indexed as typical medullary carcinoma, atypical medullary carcinoma, or infiltrative ductal carcinoma. A set of 16 slides was circulated two times among the nine pathologists. The diagnoses of typical and atypical medullary carcinomas were based on a definition given by Ridolfi et al. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement was low, with a kappa value of less than .50. The only histological criterion that had more than 50% agreement was the presence or absence of an in situ component in the tumor, assuming that the disagreement of one pathologist is accepted. This study is a snapshot of the problems encountered in the diagnosis of typical medullary carcinoma in a routine context and it shows high levels of variations in diagnostic consistency.
|
| pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Oct
|
| pubmed:issn |
0003-9985
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
117
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
N
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1005-8
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1993
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Medullary carcinoma of the breast. A multicenter study of its diagnostic consistency.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Institut Jean-Godinot, Reims, France.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Multicenter Study
|