Linked Life Data

8199816

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8199816

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-7-5
pubmed:abstractText
Since the development of video endoscopic surgery, the number of transthoracic endoscopic sympathectomy has been increasing. The use of double-lumen endobronchial tube or single-lumen endobronchial tube during anesthesia for these surgeries has been a controversial. 385 palmar hyperhidrosis patients divided into three groups: group I, under alterative one lung ventilation anesthesia with double-lumen endobronchial tube; group II, under alterative one lung ventilation anesthesia with single-lumen endobronchial tube; group III, under two lung ventilation anesthesia with single-lumen endobronchial tube were studied. All had received bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy. The age of patients ranged from 8 to 64 years old. There were 154 male and 231 female. The average anesthesia durations for group I, II and III were 38.56 +/- 10.28, 34.14 +/- 5.21, 31.83 +/- 3.34 min respectively. The variables considered in the study were: physique of the patients; duration of anesthesia; airway pressure changes; SaO2 changes during the operation and post-anesthesia complaints. We found that upon using double-lumen endobronchial tube, SaO2 levels was better maintained especially in the obese patients and the patients who had received a traditional surgical operation before.
pubmed:language
chi
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0529-5769
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
7-12
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
[Comparison of double-lumen endobnonchial versus single-lumen endotracheal tube anesthesia in bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy].
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anesthesiology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, R.O.C.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract