Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8180304rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026339lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8180304lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033137lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8180304lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8180304lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242428lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8180304lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019664lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8180304lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038951lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8180304lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:dateCreated1994-6-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:abstractTextWe aimed to discover the opinion of primary care doctors regarding the structure, usefulness and problems when using two models of clinical records employed consecutively in the same health centres.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:languagespalld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:issn0212-6567lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MerinoJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ArenasMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OrozcoDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:authorpubmed-author:QiK YKYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:authorpubmed-author:QuirceFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeldaJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:volume13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:pagination182-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:dateRevised2010-3-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8180304-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:articleTitle[An opinion/satisfaction survey on 2 models of clinical histories used in primary care].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:affiliationDepartamento de Medicina, Universidad de Alicante.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8180304pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed