rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-6-16
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We aimed to discover the opinion of primary care doctors regarding the structure, usefulness and problems when using two models of clinical records employed consecutively in the same health centres.
|
pubmed:language |
spa
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
0212-6567
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
15
|
pubmed:volume |
13
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
182-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-3-24
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Attitude of Health Personnel,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Chi-Square Distribution,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Consumer Satisfaction,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Medical History Taking,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Models, Theoretical,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Physicians,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Primary Health Care,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Questionnaires,
pubmed-meshheading:8180304-Spain
|
pubmed:year |
1994
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[An opinion/satisfaction survey on 2 models of clinical histories used in primary care].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Alicante.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|