Linked Life Data

8168556

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8168556

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-6-2
pubmed:abstractText
To determine their ability to detect blood-borne pathogens, the blood culture media BCB Release (Becton Dickinson, USA) and Signal (Oxoid, UK) were evaluated on a total of 5,122 blood culture sets. Each of the two bottles was inoculated with an equal amount of blood from 2,262 patients at bedside (2.3 cultures per patient). In the laboratory, agar-coated paddles were attached to the BCB Release bottles and the Signal device was mounted onto the Signal bottles. Both systems were incubated at 35 degrees C for seven days. A total of 608 (11.9%) sets were positive, from which 549 pathogenic microorganisms could be isolated. These could be grown significantly (p < 0.0001) more often from the BCB Release broth (n = 483) than from the Signal system (n = 384). Mainly staphylococci, Escherichia coli and yeasts were isolated more often from the BCB Release, anaerobes were more often detected from the Oxoid Signal. The time to positivity was significantly shorter (p < 0.0001) with the BCB Release. The Signal system proved a valuable complement to the BCB Release broth.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0934-9723
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
13
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
28-32
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of two commercial blood culture media for the detection of blood-borne pathogens.
pubmed:affiliation
Laboratoire Central de Bactériologie, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study