Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-5-17
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
To determine the reliability of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel, processed by the Walkaway-96, and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card, 150 clinical yeast isolates (30 Candida albicans, 67 Candida species, not albicans, 26 Torulopsis glabrata, 13 Cryptococcus neoformans, 4 Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 6 Trichosporon beigelii, 3 Rhodotorula species, and 1 Geotrichum species) were tested on both systems. Results were compared with those obtained by the API 20C and the appearance of yeast cells on cornmeal Tween-80 agar. After inoculation of each system, results were available in 4 hours with MicroScan panels, 24-48 hours with Vitek cards, and 72 hours with the API 20C strips. On initial testing, 101 (67%) and 128 (85%) isolates, respectively, were correctly identified by MicroScan and Vitek. After repeat testing, the number of correctly identified isolates increased to 123 (82%) by MicroScan and to 142 (95%) by Vitek. Yeasts most commonly misidentified were Candida tropicalis, T glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis by MicroScan and C tropicalis and T glabrata by Vitek.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Apr
|
| pubmed:issn |
0002-9173
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
101
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
438-42
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1994
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|