Linked Life Data

8153564

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8153564

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-5-12
pubmed:abstractText
Speech was mixed with different noise signals and then processed according to the well-known noise reduction method of 'spectral subtraction'. Three different algorithms were examined. The speech signals were subjected to a four alternative forced choice (4AFC) test. Both the processed and unprocessed signals were evaluated psycho-acoustically and objectively. Speech intelligibility was measured with the 4AFC test by presenting the signals via headphones to a group of normal-hearing and to a group of hearing-impaired listeners. The intelligibility scores were compared with the intelligibility scores predicted from a modified version of the Speech Transmission Index (STI). It appeared that although the noise reduction algorithms reduced the noise level, they did not improve the measured speech intelligibility, either for normal-hearing or for hearing-impaired listeners. This, however, was inconsistent with the scores estimated from STI, which erroneously predicted a significant improvement in intelligibility due to the noise reduction processing.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0107-8593
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
50-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI.
pubmed:affiliation
Widex ApS, Voerløse, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study