Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
11
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-4-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Despite the emergence of several alternative angiographic imaging techniques (i.e., magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and ultrasound angiography), x-ray angiography remains the predominant vascular imaging modality, generating over $4 billion in revenue a year in U.S. hospitals. In this issue, we provide a brief overview of the various angiographic imaging techniques, comparing them with x-ray angiography, and discuss the clinical aspects of x-ray vascular imaging, including catheterization and clinical applications. Clinical, cost, usage, and legal issues related to contrast media are discussed in "Contrast Media: Ionic versus Nonionic and Low-osmolality Agents." We also provide a technical overview and selection guidance for a basic x-ray angiography imaging system, including the gantry and table system, x-ray generator, x-ray tube, image intensifier, video camera and display monitors, image-recording devices, and digital acquisition and processing systems. This issue also contains our Evaluation of the GE Advantx L/C cardiac angiography system and the GE Advantx AFM general-purpose angiography system; the AFM can be used for peripheral, pulmonary, and cerebral vascular studied, among others, and can also be configured for cardiac angiography. Many features of the Advantx L/C system, including generator characteristics and ease of use, also apply to the Advantx AFM as configured for cardiac angiography. Our ratings are based on the systems' ability to provide the best possible image quality for diagnosis and therapy while minimizing patient and personnel exposure to radiation, as well as its ability to minimize operator effort and inconvenience. Both units are rated Acceptable. In the Guidance Section, "Radiation Safety and Protection," we discuss the importance of keeping patient and personnel exposures to radiation as low as reasonably possible, especially in procedures such as cardiac catheterization, angiographic imaging for special procedures, and interventional radiology, which produce among the highest radiation exposure of all x-ray imaging techniques. We also provide recommendations for minimizing personnel and patient exposures to radiation. For more information about x-ray angiography systems and similar devices, as well as for additional perspectives on which we based this study, see the following Health Devices Evaluations: "Mobile C-arm Units" (19[8], August 1990) and "Noninvasive Electronic Quality Control Devices for X-ray Generator Testing" (21[6-7], June-July 1992).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
0046-7022
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
22
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:pagination |
507-54
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Angiography,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Catheterization,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Equipment Safety,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Heart Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Radiation Protection,
pubmed-meshheading:8119801-Technology Assessment, Biomedical
|
pubmed:year |
1993
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
X-ray angiography systems.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|