Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-3-31
pubmed:abstractText
In a comparative study, we examined the use of a peripherally implantable venous access system which does not require either central venous cannulation or radiological screening. We compared the complication rate in 85 patients receiving this system with that in 112 similar patients receiving Hickman lines. In addition, we examined the safety and cost implications of using a ward setting instead of full operating facilities for port insertion. There was a 10.7% incidence of early and 37.6% incidence of late complications in the group receiving Hickman lines compared with only 2.4% early complications and 10.6% late complications in those receiving peripherally implantable ports. There was no difference in complication rates between those patients who had the ports inserted in a ward side room compared with those who had their procedure performed in the operating theatre. We have demonstrated the ease and reliability of port insertion in the absence of screening radiology and we therefore suggest the peripheral port as a safe, cost-effective alternative to existing venous access systems.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-109934, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-2163116, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-2790689, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-3127896, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-3158261, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-3918783, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-3929413, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-3943036, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-3958769, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-4632149, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-4968812, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-5100094, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-6103386, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-6701786, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-6711759, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-6779651, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-6850543, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-6916588, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-6959532, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-7123491, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-8017825, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-8017826, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-821160, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/8117017-8518897
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0035-8843
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
76
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
33-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison between peripherally implanted ports and externally sited catheters for long-term venous access.
pubmed:affiliation
Academic Surgical Unit, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't