Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-3-29
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The waiting list for cadaver kidney transplantation continues to grow. Yet there has been little increase in the number of living-donor transplants. At many centers, willing relatives are turned down as potential donors because of poor HLA ABDR matching with the recipient. It has been our policy to accept the 0-haplotype-match (0-HTM) living-related donor. We studied long-term (6-year) outcome of 0-HTM transplants compared with the outcome of transplants from 1- and 2-HTM recipients and from cadaver donors. Since 1984, 352 adults have received primary living-related renal transplants, and had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up: 92 2-HTM, 216 1-HTM, and 44 0-HTM. In the same period and with the same follow-up, 362 adults have received primary cadaver (CAD) renal transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone (triple therapy) for living-donor and sequential therapy for CAD recipients. ABDR match (mean +/- SD) for 0 HTM was 1.3 +/- 8; CAD, 2.0 +/- 1.6; % peak panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) for 0 HTM was 1.2 +/- 5.3; 1 HTM, 6.7 +/- 20; 2 HTM, 7.5 +/- 21; CAD, 15.5 +/- 30. The percentage of PRA at the time of transplant for 0 HTM was .7 +/- 4.4; 1 HTM, 4.1 +/- 1.6; 2 HTM, 6 +/- 18; CAD, 7.2 +/- 20. While the number of ABDR matches was significantly fewer for 0 HTM than for the other groups, the % PRA at transplant and the peak % PRA were less in the 0-HTM group. Other demographics were not significantly different. Patient survival was significantly lower in the CAD group vs. 2-HTM recipients (P < .05). The living-related grafts had significantly greater survival than the CAD grafts (P < .05), but there was no significant difference between 0-, 1-, and 2-HTM graft survival. The most common causes of graft loss in all groups were death and chronic rejection. In our experience, the long-term graft survivals of 0-HTM and 1-HTM transplants are the same, and both are superior to CAD results, using 0-HTM living-related donor transplants should be continued and encouraged.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0041-1337
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
27
|
pubmed:volume |
57
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
512-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Cadaver,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Graft Survival,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-HLA Antigens,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Haplotypes,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Histocompatibility,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Kidney Transplantation,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Survival Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:8116034-Tissue Donors
|
pubmed:year |
1994
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Successful long-term outcome with 0-haplotype-matched living-related kidney donors.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|