Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-9-27
pubmed:abstractText
Case-control studies can often be made more efficient by using frequency matching, randomized recruitment, stratified sampling, or two-stage sampling. These designs share two common features: (1) some "first-stage" variables are ascertained for all study subjects, while complete variable ascertainment is carried out for only a selected subsample, and (2) the subsampling of subjects for "second-stage" variable ascertainment depends jointly on their disease status and their observed first-stage variables. Because first-stage variables alter the subsampling fractions, standard analyses require a multiplicative specification of any joint effects of a second- and a first-stage variable. We show that by making use of missing data methods, maximum likelihood estimates can be obtained for risk parameters of interest, even those characterizing interactions between first- and second-stage variables. Joint effects can thus be modelled flexibly, with allowance for both additive and multiplicative models. Preliminary data from a case-control study of lung cancer as related to age, sex, and smoking provide an example, leading to the suggestion that the combined effect of age and smoking is multiplicative.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0006-341X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
50
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
350-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Flexible maximum likelihood methods for assessing joint effects in case-control studies with complex sampling.
pubmed:affiliation
Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study