Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-9-9
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Comprehension of the intricate complexities of sperm function is clearly crucial to the success of attempts to manipulate it for the purposes of assisted conception. This is particularly important when considering various procedures for microassisted fertilization since these bypass critical physiological events that are mandatory for normal fertilization, to varying degrees. Methylxanthine derivatives such as pentoxifylline are useful agents for the management of oligoasthenozoospermic patients. This is particularly so for procedures such as SUZI where adequate motility of spermatozoa injected into the perivitelline space is crucial for fusion with the vitelline membrane to achieve fertilization. The generation of minute concentrations of reactive oxygen species in vitro may prove to be a valuable technique in this respect, in the light of recent evidence for their involvement in capacitation and hyperactivation. Induction of the acrosome reaction by non-invasive, non-toxic agents should markedly improve success rates for microassisted fertilization. Acrosin appears to play a central role in this and, therefore, it would seem prudent to monitor levels of acrosin activity in samples of spermatozoa used in assisted conception procedures. With respect to microassisted fertilization, the potential to select recently acrosome-reacted spermatozoa coated by activated acrosin promises to be a major improvement. Current methods employed for determination of the fertilization potential of spermatozoa are clearly inadequate (Polansky and Lamb, 1988; Aitken, 1990). In fact, the prevailing evidence suggests that no single parameter of sperm function reflects this potential (Zaneveld and Jeyendran, 1988). Therefore, we have both a scientific and a moral responsibility to investigate these processes further. Subsequently, we should be in a position to identify individual gametes with the potential for fertilization and so utilize procedures that result in maximal fertilization rates with minimal risk of polyploidy or abnormality.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
0950-3552
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
8
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
43-64
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2005-11-16
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Autoantibodies,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Electroporation,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Fertilization in Vitro,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Isoantibodies,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Micromanipulation,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Specimen Handling,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Sperm Transport,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Sperm-Ovum Interactions,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Spermatozoa,
pubmed-meshheading:8055675-Zona Pellucida
|
pubmed:year |
1994
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Sperm function and its manipulation for microassisted fertilization.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|