Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-8-30
pubmed:abstractText
Can intellectual performance be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, and can it be useful to evaluate competence and pedagogic capacity? Experts and laws attempted to answer these questions in the last years. A recent law establishes that the Board of examiners should formulate the evaluation criteria of maximum before the examination of titles to proceed with a fair evaluation of didactic and scientific titles of the candidates. A clear and unequivocal position on the importance of teaching in Medical Schools comes from the Consensus Conference of the World Federation for Medical Education in 1988 and more recently from the World Summit on Medical Education (1993). Proposals: a task-force has recently been constituted with the following objectives: identify of evaluation criteria on teaching competence and formulate strategies of co-optation. Action: teaching and pedagogic capacities should be evaluated in a quantitative and qualitative manner. The Faculty and/or other institutional organisms could certify teaching activity within the Faculty (quantitative indicators) through the "credit system" and the quality of teaching could be evaluated by the students and/or by institutional organisms. Conclusions: The evaluation of teaching competence in equally important as the evaluation of biomedical research.
pubmed:language
ita
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0034-1193
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
85
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
311-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
[Teaching merit should be valued? Reflections and proposals].
pubmed:affiliation
Istituto di Medicina Interna, Università G. D'Annunzio, Chieti.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract