Linked Life Data

8038977

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8038977

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-8-19
pubmed:abstractText
A controlled randomized double-blinded clinical study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the efficacy of three methods of preventing pain during injection of propofol on induction of anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to six groups: saline pretreatment, followed by induction with propofol at room temperature plus saline; lidocaine pretreatment, followed by induction with propofol at room temperature plus saline; saline pretreatment, followed by induction with propofol at a temperature of 4 degrees C plus saline; lidocaine pretreatment, followed by induction with propofol at a temperature of 4 degrees C plus saline; saline pretreatment, followed by induction with propofol at room temperature plus lidocaine 40 mg; saline pretreatment, followed by induction with propofol at a temperature of 4 degrees C plus lidocaine 40 mg. Pretreatment with lidocaine reduced the incidence of pain and discomfort significantly compared with unpretreated groups. Groups which received propofol mixed with lidocaine also showed a significant reduced incidence of pain. induction with cold 4 degrees C propofol showed no significant difference in reduction of injection pain.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0529-5769
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
73-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Pain on injection of propofol.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anesthesiology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan, R.O.C.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial