Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-1-18
pubmed:abstractText
The literature is unclear as to which muscles and how many are required for a sensitive lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) screen. A retrospective study of 247 electrodiagnostically confirmed LSRs in 201 patients over a 3-yr period was conducted to determine how many muscles were required to identify a LSR. All LSRs showed abnormal spontaneous activity (positive waves or fibrillation potentials) in two or more muscles innervated by the same nerve root level but different peripheral nerves. All cases were categorized by radiculopathy level, and the most frequently abnormal individual muscles were combined into different muscle screens. The frequency with which each muscle screen identified a radiculopathy was the frequency with which one or more muscles in the screen displayed abnormal spontaneous activity divided by the total number of radiculopathies. The paraspinal muscles (PM) alone identified 88% of LSRs. Without PM, two muscle screens identified only 14-68%, three muscle screens identified 37-89% and four muscle screens identified 45-92%. Including PM, three muscle screens identified 86-94% of LSRs, four muscle screens identified 91-97% and five muscle screens yielded 94-98% identification. Seven to ten muscle screens resulted in minimal improvements in identifying a LSR with 98-99% identification. We conclude that five muscle LSR screens, including PM, are sufficient to identify LSRs while minimizing patient discomfort and examiner time.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0894-9115
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
73
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
394-402
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Lumbosacral radiculopathy screen. Optimizing the number of muscles studies.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.