Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-11-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
182 patients assessed their condition after automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD). The analysis of descriptive data parameters++ provides new guidelines for the indication of this minimally invasive procedure: persistent leg pain despite conservative treatment, lumbar disc prolapse in one segment, minimal monological pathology, This ideal constellation implies a restriction of the common guidelines. Under these premises 50% of the patients will be satisfied. So the indication for APLD seems to be justified under more unfavorable patient profiles if the natural course of sciatica was poor.
|
pubmed:language |
ger
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0044-3220
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
132
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
316-21
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Back Pain,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Diskectomy, Percutaneous,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Intervertebral Disc Displacement,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Lumbar Vertebrae,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Patient Satisfaction,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Prognosis,
pubmed-meshheading:7941692-Reoperation
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Satisfaction following automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy as a function of clinical parameters].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
English Abstract
|