Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0003842,
umls-concept:C0026820,
umls-concept:C0034693,
umls-concept:C0034721,
umls-concept:C0036751,
umls-concept:C0086597,
umls-concept:C0205097,
umls-concept:C0205409,
umls-concept:C0205464,
umls-concept:C0597357,
umls-concept:C0740422,
umls-concept:C0871261,
umls-concept:C1321564,
umls-concept:C1704632,
umls-concept:C1706817,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C2911692
|
pubmed:issue |
10
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1994-2-24
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Contractile responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and to a number of 5-HT-receptor agonists have been compared on the rat isolated caudal artery and stomach fundic strip. On the caudal artery, 5-HT was the most potent agonist tested. The 5-HT 1-like agonist, 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT), was less potent than 5-HT and produced a lower maximum response. 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and RU24969 (5-methoxy-3(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)1Hindole) were inactive as agonists and 8-OH-DPAT was not an antagonist. Ketanserin, ICI 169,369 (2-(2-dimethylaminoethylthio)-3-phenylquinoline hydrochloride) and ICI 170,809 (2-(2-dimethylamino-2-methylpropylthio)-3- phenylquinoline hydrochloride) were competitive antagonists of 5-HT on this preparation, indicating that 5-HT is acting via 5-HT2 receptors. In contrast, all the agonists produced contractions of the fundic strip (rank order of potency, 5-HT = 5-CT > RU24969 > 8-OH-DPAT). The maximum response to RU24969 was significantly lower than the maximum responses to the other agonists. Ketanserin was only a weak antagonist of 5-HT in the fundic strip, demonstrating that 5-HT2 receptors were not involved, but ICI 169,369 and ICI 170,809 were non-surmountable antagonists of 5-HT responses, as were methysergide and methiothepin. Since ICI 169,369 and ICI 170,809 are devoid of activity at 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors, then these two subtypes would not appear to be implicated, a view that was confirmed in the case of 5-HT3 receptors by experiments using ondansetron.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0022-3573
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
45
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
876-81
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-18
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Arteries,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Gastric Fundus,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Muscle, Smooth,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Muscle, Smooth, Vascular,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Muscle Contraction,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Rats,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Receptors, Serotonin,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Serotonin,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Serotonin Antagonists,
pubmed-meshheading:7904626-Serotonin Receptor Agonists
|
pubmed:year |
1993
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A pharmacological comparison of the receptors mediating contractile responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine in the rat isolated caudal artery and fundic strip.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Bioscience II Department, Zeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
In Vitro
|