Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-5-27
pubmed:abstractText
The risk for birth defects in the offspring of first cousin parents is substantially higher than in the offspring of non-consanguineous parents. As a general decline in the frequency of consanguineous marriages was observed in this century, one wonders whether consanguinity is still a factor in the appearance of birth defects in developed countries. Based on our registry of congenital anomalies, we think that the answer to this question is "yes." In the population studied in Northeastern France, consanguineous matings were known in 1.08% of the cases with congenital anomalies, vs. 0.28% in controls (P < 0.001). The frequency of the malformations recorded paralleled the degree of consanguinity: out of 38 malformed children, 24 were seen in first cousin matings (10.5 times more frequent than in offspring of nonconsanguineous couples), 8 in second cousin marriages, and 6 in more distantly consanguineous matings. Consanguineous mothers were more often pregnant than nonconsanguineous mothers (P < 0.01) and they had more stillbirths than nonconsanguineous mothers. These results must be taken into account when counseling consanguineous couples.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0148-7299
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
1
pubmed:volume
49
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
114-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Parental consanguinity as a cause of increased incidence of birth defects in a study of 131,760 consecutive births.
pubmed:affiliation
Institut de Puériculture, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Strasbourg, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article