Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-2-14
pubmed:abstractText
Regurgitant fraction calculations by echocardiography were compared to angiocardiography in 11 patients with mitral regurgitation. Although there was a very good correlation when compared with angiocardiography (r = 0.99, SEE: 6.26, P < 0.001), two-dimensional echocardiography underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (P < 0.05). The mean regurgitant fraction was 36.2 +/- 13.5% by echocardiography and 43.6 +/- 15.7% (P < 0.05) by angiography. Most of the variability in measuring the regurgitant fraction is attributed to the left ventricular volume measurements. In conclusion, regurgitant fraction calculations of mitral regurgitation by echocardiography compares favorably to angiography. Since the severity of mitral regurgitation is an important determinant of prognosis, quantification of the regurgitant fraction may be useful in the long term follow-up of those patients.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0374-5600
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
36
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
501-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of left ventricular volumes and regurgitant fraction by Doppler echocardiography and angiography in children.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pediatrics, UCLA School of Medicine.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study