| pubmed-article:7817958 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205345 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0038126 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0029334 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0179407 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1995-2-7 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:abstractText | The level of kinetic frictional forces generated during in vitro translation at the bracket-wire interface were measured for two sintered stainless steel brackets as a function of two slot sizes, four wire alloys, and five to eight wire sizes. The two types of sintered stainless steel brackets were tested in both 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slots. Wires of four different alloy types, stainless steel (SS), cobalt chromium (Co-Cr), nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti), and beta-titanium (beta-Ti), were tested. There were five wire sizes for the 0.018-inch slot and eight wire sizes for the 0.022-inch slot. The wires were ligated into the brackets with elastomeric ligatures. Bracket movement along the wire was implemented by means of a mechanical testing instrument, and time dependent frictional forces were measured by a load cell and plotted on an X-Y recorder. For most wire sizes, lower frictional forces were generated with the SS of Co-Cr wires than with the beta-Ti or Ni-Ti wires. Increase in wire size generally resulted in increased bracket-wire friction. There were no significant differences between manufacturer for the sintered stainless steel brackets. The levels of frictional force in 0.018-inch brackets ranged from a low of 46 gm with 0.016-inch Co-Cr wire to a high of 157 gm with 0.016 x 0.025-inch beta-Ti wire. In comparing the data from a previous study by Kapila et al. 1990 performed at OUHSC with the same apparatus, the friction of sintered stainless steel brackets was approximately 40% to 45% less than the friction of the conventional stainless steel brackets. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:citationSubset | D | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:issn | 0889-5406 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CurrierG FGF | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DuncansonM... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:NandaR SRS | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:VaughanJ LJL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:volume | 107 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:pagination | 20-7 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2008-11-21 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7817958-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:year | 1995 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:articleTitle | Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Orthodontics, University of Oklahoma, College of Dentistry, Oklahoma City. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7817958 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
