Linked Life Data

7807455

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/7807455

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-1-31
pubmed:abstractText
A study was undertaken to compare open cholecystectomy with laparoscopic in terms of patient related variables. This was not a randomized study but compared two groups of patients treated at different times. A number of variables were assessed. The study showed that each method was equally effective in treating symptomatic gall stone disease. Very few significant differences, in terms of the patients' perceptions of the procedures, were found, although the trend appeared to favour the laparoscopic procedure.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0035-8835
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
39
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
232-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Audit of patients' experiences of cholecystectomy: laparoscopic and open operations compared.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, East Glamorgan General Hospital, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study