Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-2-2
pubmed:abstractText
Doxacurium (DOX), a new nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD), was compared in a randomized, double-blind fashion to high-dose vecuronium (VEC) in 60 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. A third group of 15 patients older than 70 years of age (DOX-70) was added to compare the effects of DOX to VEC in the older population. Endpoints of the study were hemodynamic stability, ease of ventilation and intubation, anesthesiologist's satisfaction, drug interventions to correct hemodynamic instability, and total cost of the drug. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (30 micrograms/kg) along with the NMBD (DOX 80 micrograms/kg, VEC 400 micrograms/kg) over a 2-minute period. Following induction, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were decreased (P < 0.01) in all groups. Tracheal intubation caused the HR to return to baseline in the DOX-70 group. There was no difference in central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusive pressure, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, and drug intervention for DOX and VEC. None of the patients had evidence of myocardial ischemia. There was a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant decrease in central venous pressure and systemic vascular resistance in the DOX-70 group. The durations of the induction and maintenance doses of DOX were similar in the younger and older patients. Although the intubating dose of VEC had a faster onset of action, this had no effect on the ease of ventilation, conditions for tracheal intubation, and overall anesthesiologist satisfaction. The total cost for each NMBD was not different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
1053-0770
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
8
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
490-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Anesthesiology, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Attitude of Health Personnel, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Blood Pressure, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Central Venous Pressure, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Coronary Artery Bypass, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Cost-Benefit Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Double-Blind Method, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Drug Costs, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Drug Monitoring, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Female, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Heart Rate, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Hemodynamics, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Intubation, Intratracheal, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Isoquinolines, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Male, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Respiration, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Vascular Resistance, pubmed-meshheading:7803735-Vecuronium Bromide
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic comparison of doxacurium and high-dose vecuronium during coronary artery bypass surgery: a cost-benefit study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Heart Institute, Quebec, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't