Linked Life Data

7781632

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/7781632

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-7-18
pubmed:abstractText
Continuous and single dose spinal anaesthesia were compared in a prospective randomized fashion in 108 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Continuous spinal anaesthesia was via a 20 gauge polyamide multiperforated catheter introduced through an 18 gauge Tuohy needle. Single-dose spinal anaesthesia was performed with a 24 guage x 103 mm Sprotte spinal needle. The mean local anaesthetic dose for the continuous technique was 38.4 (SD 16.5) mg as hyperbaric lignocaine 5%, and for the single-dose spinal anaesthesia 10.8 (SD 2.2) mg as hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. Segmental levels reached with the initial dose did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean time required to perform continuous spinal anaesthesia was 6.7 (SD 3.9) min, which was longer than for single dose 4.9 (SD 2.8) min (P < 0.05). The onset time and efficacy of anaesthesia, and the duration of the operation were similar in the two groups. Analgesia was inadequate in six patients who received continuous spinal anaesthesia (11%) and one patient who received single dose (2%) (P = 0.18). Hypotension was more frequent in those receiving single doses (P < 0.05). Caudal rotation of the outlet needle orifice to advance the catheter correlated with inadequate analgesia (P < 0.01, r = 0.38). There were no significant differences in the incidence of post-operative complications.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0265-0215
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
135-40
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus single dosing. A comparative study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial