Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-7-13
pubmed:abstractText
A survey was undertaken to assess the views of the manufacturers of over-the-counter (OTC) products about (i) the value of patient information leaflets (PILs), (ii) the recent European Community directive relating to PILs and (iii) the procedures which are in place for producing and testing PILs. Although approximately half (15/31) of the respondents (response rate 31/58) thought that PILs were more important for OTC than prescription only medicines, this view was not unanimous. A majority (18/28) thought that the new EC directive would provide too much information to patients although only a small number (2/27) thought that the regulations were unnecessary. Indication for the product was thought to be the most important information for the immediate outer packaging. Only about one-third (35%) of patients are thought to read PILs, in contrast to the majority who read the outer packaging. A wide variety of departments contribute to preparing PILs. The marketing department had a major input particularly with respect to layout and testing of leaflets. On the whole the design and production of PILs involves considerable effort but their testing appears less structured and thorough.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0269-4727
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
20
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
37-40
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Patient information leaflets on over-the-counter (OTC) medicines: the manufacturer's perspective.
pubmed:affiliation
School of Pharmacy, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University of Belfast, U.K.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article