Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7732977rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441247lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522318lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019010lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439830lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0552449lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0237881lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449295lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0336862lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750502lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:dateCreated1995-5-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:abstractTextThe objective of this study was to assess the use of coronary stenosis velocity in the determination of translesional pressure gradients. In the physiologic assessment of coronary stenosis, the accelerated intracoronary flow velocity within a narrowing has correlated with minimal lesion cross-sectional area according to the continuity equation. In large conduits the jet velocity can determine pressure gradients when used in the Bernouilli equation. However, the use of intralesional flow velocity for calculation of translesional pressure gradients by the simplified Bernouilli equation (delta P = 4V2) may be inaccurate in small (< 5 mm diameter) conduits. Translesional pressure (2.2F catheter) and flow velocity (0.018-inch guidewire) were measured in a single coronary artery in 23 patients undergoing diagnostic angiography or angioplasty. The electronically determined mean of phasic proximal and distal pressure and planimetry of the instantaneous phasic pressure gradient were used and compared with the instantaneous velocity calculations of pressure by the simplified Bernouilli formula with both maximal jet velocity and a modified formula including proximal velocity. The mean measured translesional pressure gradient was 18 +/- 13 mm Hg (range 0 to 50 mm Hg) and was equivalent to the instantaneous average pressure gradient by planimetry. The maximal jet velocity was 125 +/- 40 cm/sec (range 63 to 250 cm/sec), yielding a calculated pressure gradient of 3 +/- 3 mm Hg. The calculated pressure gradient by the simplified Bernouilli equation correlated poorly with the measured translesional gradient (r = 0.27, F = 1.63, p = 0.21).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:issn0002-8703lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DonohueT JTJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KernM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AguirreF VFVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LabovitzA JAJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TronCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BURNE MEMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CaraccioloE...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:volume129lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:pagination887-94lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7732977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:articleTitleHemodynamic significance of coronary jet velocity in patients: limitations of the Bernouilli equation in small conduits.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, MO, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7732977pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed