Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7719920rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020852lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020861lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039593lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015252lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205473lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205547lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280519lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:dateCreated1995-5-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:abstractTextThree procedures for the removal of immunoglobulin G (IgG) from human serum were evaluated for their effectiveness in eliminating false-positive results caused by rheumatoid factor and in removing IgG from serum to reduce competing-IgG interference in IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing. The procedures investigated employed two anti-human IgG diluents and a recombinant protein G-filled tube. The anti-human IgG was more effective than the protein G method in eliminating false-positive results caused by rheumatoid factor and removed 5.4% more IgG from serum samples in the normal range (< 1,700 mg/dl) and up to 16.4% more of the IgG from samples with elevated levels (> 1,700 mg/dl). The recombinant protein G removed less IgM than the anti-human IgG diluents; however, this difference did not affect the results of the ELISA. For these reasons, the in-house-developed anti-human IgG diluent proved to be the most effective and economical for IgM serological testing.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:issn1071-412Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoltN FNFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MartinsT BTBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JaskowskiT...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MouritsenC...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:volume2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:pagination98-103lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7719920-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:articleTitleAn evaluation of the effectiveness of three immunoglobulin G (IgG) removal procedures for routine IgM serological testing.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Immunology, Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Salt Lake City, UT 84108.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7719920pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7719920lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7719920lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7719920lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7719920lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7719920lld:pubmed