Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1995-5-11
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The analysis of covariance is often used in the context of premeasure/postmeasure designs to compare treatment and control groups in both randomized [1] and nonrandomized [2] studies. The intent is to adjust the difference between the changes in the 2 groups for any difference which might exist at baseline, i.e., for any difference between the premeasures in the 2 groups. An important assumption underlying the use of the analysis of covariance is that the slopes of the lines for the regression of the postmeasure on the premeasure in the 2 groups are equal. In this paper we describe a program which can be used to test the hypothesis of equal slopes; and performs an alternative analysis which does not depend on this assumption. This is done in the context of comparing treatment and control groups with respect to a measurement subject to natural maturation as in [3]. Equal slopes in this context means equal growth rates; unequal slopes implies that the 2 groups are growing at different rates. The method, known as the Johnson-Neyman procedure [4] is, however, more general than this, and can be used in any two-sample comparison where an alternative to the usual analysis of covariance is deemed appropriate. The procedure identifies a 'region of significance' which is especially useful in practice. This region consists of a set of values of the premeasure for which the treatment and the control groups are significantly different with respect to the postmeasure.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0020-7101
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
37
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
151-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Analysis of Variance,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Body Weight,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Computer Simulation,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Growth,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Mathematical Computing,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Microcomputers,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Models, Biological,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Models, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Rats,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Regression Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Research Design,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Software,
pubmed-meshheading:7705895-Thiouracil
|
pubmed:year |
1994
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Assessing the effect of a treatment when subjects are growing at different rates.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Dental School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|