Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-10-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In mud-and-thatch houses of Santiago del Estero Province, north-west Argentina, where no insecticides had been sprayed officially to control domestic infestations of the Chagas disease vector Triatoma infestans (Klug) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), two knockdown (KD) insecticidal collection procedures were compared with the standard flush-out (FO) method for sampling T. infestans. Bugs were collected by FO using 0.2% tetramethrin in bedrooms of (1) 41 houses of Amamá village employing 1 man-hour of capture effort per house, and (2) 19 houses of Trinidad and Mercedes villages employing 4 man-hours/house. From the same houses, 2-5 days after the manual FO collection, bugs were collected by KD indoor-spraying of deltamethrin 25 mg a.i./m2 in Amamá, or burning of one gamma-HCH (= gamma-BHC) fumigant tablet 3.1 g of gamma-isomer) per bedroom in Trinidad and Mercedes. The majority of infestations were detected by both methods, the proportion of positive houses being 81% at Amamá and 95% at the other villages. Although the FO method was more sensitive, at least because it was applied first, the KD method detected infestations in 25% of houses where bugs were not found by FO. Bug densities estimated by FO or by subsequent KD in each house were significantly correlated: r = 0.795 for deltamethrin; r = 0.882 for gamma-HCH. Compared with FO collections of T. infestans large stages, i.e. adults plus fourth and fifth instar nymphs, the KD catch averaged 0.88 x with deltamethrin and 0.57 x with gamma-HCH, regardless of the apparent population density of bugs per house. However, the KD method has practical advantages of speed and standardization.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Insecticides,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Lindane,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Nitriles,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Pyrethrins,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/decamethrin,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/tetramethrin
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0269-283X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
7
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
238-42
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Argentina,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Entomology,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Housing,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Insecticides,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Lindane,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Nitriles,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Population Density,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Pyrethrins,
pubmed-meshheading:7690269-Triatoma
|
pubmed:year |
1993
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of two sampling methods for domestic populations of Triatoma infestans in north-west Argentina.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Laboratorio de Ecología General, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|