Linked Life Data

7673817

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/7673817

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-10-17
pubmed:abstractText
Rapid manual processing solutions produce wet, readable radiographs in 1 to 2 min. However, some manufacturers permit time reductions for various processing steps to obtain images even more quickly. Differences in densitometric characteristics and spatial resolution between abbreviated rapid processing (ARP) and complete rapid processing were examined in four rapid manual processing systems on D- and E-speed film. When compared with films processed conventionally in an automatic processor, films processed in rapid manual processing chemistries had more fog and generally lower levels of speed and contrast. ARP radiographs were excessively stained unless they were washed for at least 60 s after fixing. The most severe depreciation in ARP film quality occurred when developing time was reduced by 50%; the complete rapid processing developing time should always be used. E-speed films produced radiographs with comparable densitometric and resolution characteristics to D-speed films for ARP and complete rapid processing techniques while requiring 40% less radiation.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0099-2399
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
21
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
180-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Detroit Mercy, School of Dentistry, Michigan 48207, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study