Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-8-18
pubmed:abstractText
Small intestinal tumors are relatively rare, notoriously difficult to diagnose, and often advanced at the time of definitive treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between benign and malignant tumors of the small intestine and between symptomatic and asymptomatic tumors with respect to their clinical presentation, efficacy of diagnostic procedures, and surgical management with correlation to pathologic findings. Forty-nine patients with primary small intestinal tumors between 1981-1993 had 17 benign and 32 malignant tumors. Benign tumors more commonly presented with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage (29% versus 6%, P < 0.05), and were often asymptomatic (47% versus 6%, P < 0.05). Malignant tumors more commonly presented with abdominal pain (63% versus 24%, P < 0.05) and weight loss (38% versus 0%, P < 0.05). The total number of diagnostic tests/patient averaged 2.3 +/- 0.3, and the average time from onset of symptoms to resection was 30.2 +/- 6.6 weeks. Upper endoscopy, angiography, and upper gastrointestinal contrast studies had the most useful sensitivity rates. Surgical treatment of tumors included biopsy/excision, limited bowel resection, segmental resection with regional lymphadenectomy, or a bypass procedure. The most common types of benign and malignant tumors were leiomyoma (41%) and adenocarcinoma (53%), respectively. Histologically, tumors were evenly distributed throughout the small intestine. Small intestinal tumors remain difficult to diagnose because of an atypical presentation and renew the need for appropriate suspicion when treating patients with vague abdominal symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0003-1348
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
61
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
698-702; discussion 702-3
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Abdominal Pain, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Adenocarcinoma, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Angiography, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Biopsy, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Contrast Media, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Diagnosis, Differential, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Female, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Intestinal Neoplasms, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Intestine, Small, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Leiomyoma, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Lymph Node Excision, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Lymphatic Metastasis, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Male, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Sensitivity and Specificity, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:7618809-Weight Loss
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
The continuing clinical dilemma of primary tumors of the small intestine.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study