Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
14
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-8-17
pubmed:abstractText
Besides asbestos exposure, the factors that determine susceptibility to malignant mesothelioma are unknown. We evaluated the risk of GSTM1 null genotype and slow acetylation-associated NAT2 genotype for malignant mesothelioma in relation to asbestos exposure. Both the GSTM1 null genotype and the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype placed individuals at about 2-fold increased risk of developing malignant mesothelioma [odds ratio (OR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.0-3.5 and OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1-4.1, for the GSTM1 and NAT2 genes, respectively]. When the patients were divided into low/moderate and high exposure groups according to their asbestos exposure histories, the effect of the at-risk genotypes was mostly attributable to the high exposure groups (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.0-5.6 and OR = 3.7, 95% CI = 1.3-10.2, for the GSTM1 and NAT2 genes, respectively). The individuals with combined GSTM1 and NAT2 defects had about a 4-fold risk of developing malignant mesothelioma compared to those with the GSTM1 gene and NAT2 fast acetylator genotype (OR = 3.6; 95% CI = 1.3-9.6). Moreover, the risk among subjects highly exposed to asbestos with the double at-risk genotype was more than 7-fold greater compared to those with the more beneficial genotypes of both GSTM1 and NAT2 genes (OR = 7.4; 95% CI = 1.6-34.0).
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0008-5472
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
55
pubmed:geneSymbol
GSTM1, NAT2
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2981-3
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-9-8
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Inherited GSTM1 and NAT2 defects as concurrent risk modifiers in asbestos-related human malignant mesothelioma.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study