Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1995-12-1
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose of this paper is to assess whether MEDLINE, a common source for reviewing the medical literature, is complete with regard to referencing papers published and abstracted in The Journal of Emergency Medicine (JEM) over a 10-year period. In that time, 1178 abstracts and 843 original contributions were included in JEM. All papers were reviewed and classified as either a review of subject, case report with review of literature, editorial, or prospective or retrospective original research. Results showed 98.5% of all original work published in JEM and 99.74% of all abstracts referenced in JEM were found in MEDLINE, thus supporting the hypothesis that MEDLINE is a complete and thorough database for current literature.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0736-4679
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
13
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
457-60
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Abstracting and Indexing as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Authorship,
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Bias (Epidemiology),
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Emergency Medicine,
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-MEDLINE,
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Periodicals as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Publishing,
pubmed-meshheading:7594362-Research Design
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The completeness of MEDLINE for papers published and abstracted in the Journal of Emergency Medicine.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University of California, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Diego 92103-8676, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|