Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
320
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-12-14
pubmed:abstractText
A retrospective comparison of dynamic and static locking mode nonreamed nails in 88 closed, Grades I and II open tibial fractures is presented. Amount of time and number of reoperations required to unite fractures were compared for dynamic (Group 1, n = 31) and static locked (Group 2, n = 13) Winquist I and II fractures, and dynamic (Group 3, n = 14) and static locked (Group 4, n = 30) Winquist III, IV, and segmental fractures. Total reoperations also were compared; Tibias treated with dynamic nails united in an average of 20 weeks, with 3 reoperations; tibias treated with static locked nails united in an average of 30 weeks, with 21 reoperations. Group 1 fractures united in an average of 20 weeks, with 1 reoperation; Group 2 fractures united in an average of 32 weeks, with 4 reoperations. Group 3 fractures united in an average of 20 weeks; Group 4 fractures united in an average of 29 weeks, with 11 reoperations. In the group of tibias treated with dynamic nails, 3 additional operations were done; in the group of tibias treated with static locked nails, 7 additional operations were done. There was 1 infection and 3 deformities. Static locking mode appeared to delay union, especially when Groups 1 and 2 are compared; these fractures can be nailed without locking screws.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0009-921X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
119-24
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Nonreamed nailing of closed and minor open tibial fractures in patients with blunt polytrauma.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study