Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7311565rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521346lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024399lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024400lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871261lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2911692lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706817lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0450442lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:dateCreated1982-2-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:abstractTextRespiratory responses to a variety of known bronchoactive agents were compared in anesthetized rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) monkeys. Administration of 0.1 to 1.0% histamine aerosols resulted in an increase in airway resistance of 50 to 200% and a decrease in lung compliance of 30 to 80%. Aerosols of prostaglandin E2 (1 mg/ml), terbutaline (10 mg/ml), and isoproterenol (10 mg/ml) or iv aminophylline (up to 7.0 mg/kg) administered concomitantly with histamine produced a transient reversal of the histamine-induced changes in both species. Since the rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys responded in a comparable manner to these bronchodilator agents, the cynomolgus monkey appears to be an additional valuable model for the evaluation of potential bronchoactive compounds.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:issn0160-5402lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoodmanF RFRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AshackR JRJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:O'NeilR MRMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:volume5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:pagination267-73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7311565-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:year1981lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:articleTitleA comparative study of the respiratory responses to bronchoactive agents in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7311565pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed