Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1979-3-24
pubmed:abstractText
1. A new interlaboratory survey design, that uses regression analysis to compare results from each laboratory with target values, was tested using cholesterol and triglyceride analyses. The fifty New Zealand laboratories involved showed considerable interlaboratory variation (CV = 8% to 27% for cholesterol, 13% to 113% for triglycerides), 30% and 40% of which was associated with systematic differences between laboratories. 2. End-of-period summaries using regression analysis confirmed the presence of systematic errors. These were either simple types caused apparently by incorrect standardisation (regression slope, B not equal to 1.0) or inappropriate blank correction (intercept, A not equal to zero) or complex types presumably due to nonlinearity or nonspecificity. Graphical display of results from each laboratory aided fault diagnosis and allowed the detection of between-run standardisation differences. 3. Method comparison studies were made: the only highly significant result being lower precision achieved by enzymatic cholesterol methods compared with other colorimetric methods.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0009-9120
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
11
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
194-203
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1978
pubmed:articleTitle
Regression analysis in interlaboratory surveys: a case study with cholesterol and triglycerides.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study