Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3 Pt 1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1981-5-13
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Specific aspects of the original study, its replicability and the soundness of the methodology in appreciating individual differences are commented on.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Dec
|
| pubmed:issn |
0031-5125
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
51
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
845-6
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1980
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
A response to Nicholas F. Skinner's "The Hess, et al. study of pupillary activity in heterosexual and homosexual males: a re-evaluation".
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|