Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-2-14
pubmed:abstractText
Sympathetic and hemodynamic response to a constant volume removal was investigated during pure ultrafiltration, hemofiltration, acetate hemodialysis, and bicarbonate hemodialysis in the same ESRD patients. Small solute removal rates were matched. The sympathetic response resulting in an increase of total peripheral vascular resistance was found to be qualitatively adequate in ultrafiltration and hemofiltration, but not in acetate and bicarbonate hemodialysis. This inadequate response to volume removal explains the clinically observed hemodynamic instability during hemodialysis. The purpose of the study was to substantiate the, compared to hemodialysis, improved tolerance to fluid withdrawal during ultrafiltration and hemofiltration with hemodynamic data and to correlate hemodynamic and sympathetic changes during the different treatment modalities of uremia.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0028-2766
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
31
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
324-32
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1982
pubmed:articleTitle
Sympathetic and hemodynamic response to volume removal during different forms of renal replacement therapy.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.